No. 66 (2026): Comunicación política ante el cambio climático
Periscopio electoral

Fourth time’s a charm. The electoral campaign of Keiko Fujimori and the challenge of transitioning toward a government communication strategy

Jorge Acevedo Rojas
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

Keywords

  • elecciones,
  • comunicación política,
  • polarización,
  • desinformación,
  • Perú
  • elections,
  • political communication,
  • polarization,
  • disinformation,
  • Peru

How to Cite

Acevedo Rojas, J. (2026). Fourth time’s a charm. The electoral campaign of Keiko Fujimori and the challenge of transitioning toward a government communication strategy. Más Poder Local, (66), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.56151/maspoderlocal.382

Abstract

The aim of this note is to analyze, from a political communication perspective, the runoff campaign of Peru’s 2026 general elections, in which Keiko Fujimori, leader of Fuerza Popular, was elected president by a margin of 49,641 votes over her opponent, Roberto Sánchez, of Juntos por el Perú.The analysis draws on a qualitative and descriptive study based on documentary sources and social media content related to the runoff campaign conducted between April and June 2026. The campaign was characterized by high levels of affective and ideological polarization, largely shaped by the candidates’ contrasting political profiles: Fujimori was portrayed as a guarantor of order through a tough-on-crime approach, whereas Sánchez was depicted as a political successor to former President Pedro Castillo.The findings also revealed predominantly favorable media coverage of Fujimori, alongside a digital environment overrun by disinformation. Her electoral victory can be interpreted as the convergence of a security agenda historically associated with her political image, a politically weakened opponent, and an asymmetric media ecosystem. Finally, during her first 80 days in office, Fujimori’s presidential communication has demonstrated continuity with this campaign style, relying on social media platforms such as TikTok and drawing on the so-called «Bukele model» of combating crime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acevedo, J. (2026): «Tratamiento mediático de los candidatos Pedro Castillo y Keiko Fujimori en el contexto del segundo debate de las elecciones presidenciales de 2021 en el Perú». En: Debates presidenciales y comunicación política digital en procesos electorales de América Latina. (pp. 161–196). Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  2. Bennett, W. L. y Livingston, S. (2018): «The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions». European Journal of Communication, 33(2): 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
  3. Brader, T. (2005): «Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions». American Journal of Political Science, 49(2): 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2005.00130.x
  4. Cervi, L. y Marín-Lladó, C. (2021): «What are political parties doing on TikTok? The Spanish case». Profesional de la información, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.jul.03
  5. Fenoll, V., Gonçalves, I. y Bene, M. (2024): «Divisive issues, polarization, and users’ reactions on Facebook: Comparing campaigning in Latin America». Politics and Governance, 12: 7957. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7957
  6. Freelon, D., y Wells, C. (2020): «Disinformation as political communication». Political Communication, 37(2): 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1723755
  7. Fuerza Popular (2026): Perú con orden. Plan de Gobierno 2026-2031. https://www.actualidadambiental.pe/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Fuerza-Popular-Plan-de-Gobierno.pdf
  8. Gorriti, Gustavo (2026, 9 de septiembre): «Fernando Cerimedo, la ruta del humo». IDL Reporteros. https://www.idl-reporteros.pe/reporteros/fernando-cerimedo-la-ruta-del-humo/
  9. Ipsos (2026): Estudio de opinión IPSOS-PERÚ 21. Octubre 2026. https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2026-10/Ipsos%20Per%C3%BA21%20-%20Encuesta%20%20Gesti%C3%B3n%20P%C3%BAblica.pdf
  10. Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N. y Westwood, S. J. (2019): «The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States». Annual Review of Political Science, 22: 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
  11. Juntos por el Perú (2026): Plan de Gobierno 2026-2031. https://www.actualidadambiental.pe/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Juntos-por-el-Peru-Plan-de-Gobierno.pdf
  12. La República (2026, 18 de octubre): «Fernando Cerimedo tenía operadores en las elecciones del Perú». https://larepublica.pe/politica/2026/10/18/fernando-cerimedo-tenia-operadores-en-las-elecciones-del-peru-keiko-fujimori-federico-falco-fuerza-popular-hnews-879410
  13. Muñoz, P. (2021): «Latin America erupts: Peru goes populist». Journal of Democracy, 32(3): 48–62. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/latin-america-erupts-peru-goes-populist/
  14. Ojo Público (2026, 2 de septiembre): «OjoPúblico En Vivo: Caso Cerimedo y cómo opera la desinformación en Latinoamérica». https://ojo-publico.com/politica/ojopublico-vivo-caso-cerimedo-y-la-desinformacion-latinoamerica
  15. ONU-PNUD (2026): Integridad de la información en las elecciones generales 2026. Análisis y recomendaciones para futuros procesos electorales.
  16. Petrocik, J. R. (1996): «Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study». American Journal of Political Science, 40(3): 825–850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
  17. Rosen, J., Cutrona, S., Dammert, L. y Malone, M. (2026): «The Bukele effect in Latin America». Latin American Policy, 17. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.70069
  18. Rubio, M. (2022): La primera disolución constitucional del Congreso de la República. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  19. Strömbäck, J. (2008): «Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics». The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3): 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208319097
  20. Unión Europea (2026): Informe final de la Misión de Observación Electoral. Lima: Unión Europea.
  21. Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T. y Stanyer, J. (2012): «The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings». Journalism, 13(2): 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427802
  22. Waisbord, S. y Amado, A. (2017): «Populist communication by digital means: Presidential Twitter in Latin America». Information, Communication & Society, 20(9): 1330–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328521
  23. Zapata, A. (2022): Lucha política y crisis social en el Perú contemporáneo. Editorial Planeta.
  24. Zavaleta, M. y Vergara, A. (2024): Democracia asaltada. El colapso de la política peruana (y una advertencia para América Latina). Fondo Editorial de la Universidad del Pacífico.